GORGES
Case studies, demonstrations, and how it works

We would rather show you than tell you

Real systems we designed, built, and run: an operations platform, a private assistant grounded in a company's own material, a large researched content library, and a 20-year track record of software that lasts. We build our own house first, so the flagship three all run in our own companies today.

Christopher Grant The AI systems shown here were designed and built by Christopher Grant, GORGES Chief AI Officer.
Case studies

Systems we actually run

Three things AI can build for a business, and one of each running right now: work that runs itself, answers from your own material, and research or content at a scale no one could write by hand. Underneath sits a 20-year track record of software that lasts.

Our own platform   In daily production

GLIV.AI, the platform we run our own company on

Built by Christopher Grant

GLIV.AI is the AI operations platform we built for our own business, and it is the clearest answer to 'does this actually work.' It runs the repeated work of a real company every day: content drafting, scheduling and posting, monitoring, follow-up, and the morning reporting that used to eat hours. We built it the way we build for clients, one automation at a time, each one proven before the next, with a person kept on the decisions that matter.

18automations in daily production
140built to date
1platform, one place to run it all

Because we run it ourselves, we feel every rough edge before a client would. That is the point of building our own house first: what we bring you has already survived contact with a real operation.

GLIV overview dashboard GLIV people, who needs you today GLIV content desk and composer GLIV morning brief GLIV person profile GLIV funnel, stranger to student
Try the live demo → See the full GLIV.AI build →
Custom build   Live on the Great Energy site

Ask Daniela: a private knowledge assistant, grounded only in your own material

Built by Christopher Grant

For Great Energy, one of our own companies, we built 'Ask Daniela,' a private assistant that answers only from one teacher's own decade of transcripts, articles, and notes, with a second teacher's material already ingested and held in a separate knowledge base. Great Energy is a part-time education business Christopher built with his wife Daniela, so this ran in our own shop first. Every answer is grounded in that teacher's real work, and a curated story or quote is pulled alongside it. The embeddings and reranking run on Cloudflare, and Claude writes the final answer. It is live now on the Great Energy site, and it is the pattern for any business sitting on years of material nobody can search.

5,618source files scanned
71,110vectors in a deliberately cleaned index
2isolated knowledge bases, one per teacher

We run it two ways over the same knowledge base: a Claude Sonnet 5 agent, and an open-weights pipeline on Cloudflare, so a business can see whether it needs to pay frontier-model prices. Medication and crisis questions route to fixed responses before any model runs, and when we audited our own index and found private material was retrievable, we contained it the same day and added tests so it cannot return.

The actual Ask Daniela workflow in n8n, both lanes: a Claude Sonnet 5 agent lane on top and an open-weights gpt-oss 120B fixed-pipeline lane on the bottom, sharing one safety gate and one knowledge base
Try the live demo → Read the full case study →
Research & content at scale   Live

The Autoimmune Recovery Method: a searchable library, researched and drafted with AI, verified by a certified expert

Built by Christopher Grant

The Autoimmune Recovery Method is another of our own companies. We built a large, sourced education library and put AI to work on the research and the first draft, with a certified subject-matter expert, Daniela Hess, a certified AIP coach, verifying and shaping every piece before it published. The result is a structured, fully searchable resource, grounded in cited research rather than generated from nothing. It is the pattern for any business sitting on deep expertise that needs to become a searchable, trustworthy library at a scale no one could write by hand.

1,001original recipes, fully searchable
36sourced articles
100+topics explained
The build pipeline
1 · Source
Verified references and the expert's own material, held behind a research gate before anything can be used.
2 · Draft: AI first pass
A scheduled pipeline writes each recipe and topic-canonical article from scratch, one authoritative piece per topic.
3 · Gate: automated checks
A voice-retention gate proves the writing is fresh, not lightly edited, plus compliance and phrasing-collision checks.
4 · Verify: expert sign-off
A certified subject-matter expert reviews and shapes each piece. Nothing publishes without the gates and an explicit enable.
Two pipelines feed one reviewed library. AI does the heavy first pass, the gates catch how it goes wrong, a person signs off.
Built at a scale no one could write by hand
1,001
recipes
36
sourced articles
100+
topics
0
unverified publishes
1
reviewed knowledge base, powering both the searchable library and a retrieval-grounded coach
Written and reviewed once, not twice. The browse experience and the coach read from the same store.
Sourced to the study
Every claim on a page cites its source.
Aran K. et al.Journal of Nutrition Science, 2019
Bellweather R.Clinical Practice Review, 2021
Osei-Tanaka M.Applied Physiology Reports, 2018
Whitfield S. and Rourke D.Nutrition and Metabolism Notes, 2022
One authoritative article per topic, written from verified sources. Citations fabricated for the demo.
Nothing ships unverified
  • Voice-retention gate confirms fresh writing Pass
  • Every published claim cites its source Pass
  • Independent expert review completed Pass
  • Verified and enabled both required to publish Pass
No self-certification. A draft cannot mark itself reviewed. A certified expert signs off before anything reaches a reader.

The build principle is the same one behind everything else here: AI does the heavy first pass, a qualified person stays on the judgment, and nothing ships unverified.

Read the full case study → See the live library →
Billing & revenue   Both agents live

A billing-intelligence platform: two agents on one pricing engine

Built by Christopher Grant

This is the one we are building now, aimed squarely at the billing and revenue world. It is two agents on a single pricing engine. The first, a Pricing Builder, turns a pricing idea written in a sentence into a structured model and a correct sample invoice. The second, a Revenue-Leakage Auditor, takes a set of billing records and the same pricing rule, recomputes what each account should have been charged, and flags the money slipping through. They share one engine on purpose, the same parser and the same math powering both, which is what makes this a platform rather than two clever scripts. And one rule runs through all of it: AI reads the language, code computes every dollar, and a person decides what to do about it.

2agents on one platform
1shared pricing engine
0figures produced by the model
Part 1 · Pricing Builder
“$0.002 per API call, $500 monthly minimum, 10% discount on calls above 1,000,000.”
Sample invoice, 1,500,000 calls
First 1,000,000 @ $0.002$2,000.00
500,000 above 1M @ $0.002$1,000.00
Volume discount, 10%-$100.00
Total$2,900.00
AI reads the sentence, code computes every line. Live now, try it on the demos page.
The structured model it built
{ "model_type": "tiered", "unit": "API call", "tiers": [ { "up_to": 1000000, "price": 0.002, "discount": 0 }, { "up_to": null, "price": 0.002, "discount": 10 } ], "minimum": 500, "currency": "USD" }
The sentence becomes a model you can inspect, then reuse. Example.
Part 2 · Revenue-Leakage Auditor
AccountChargedExpectedDelta
Bolt$1,200$1,600-$400
Cair$3,500$3,800-$300
Dyno$0$600-$600
Echo$2,300$2,360-$60
Gale$2,000$1,800+$200
Same pricing engine, run in reverse to check the books. Example, live demo coming.
The audit result
$1,360
revenue leaking
$200
overcharged
5 of 8
accounts flagged
0
figures guessed by AI
Flagged for review. A person decides. It surfaces and explains, it does not change anyone's billing. Example.
One platform, two agents
Pricing Builder
Leakage Auditor
↓    ↓
One shared pricing engine
the same parser and the same math power both
Cloudflare Worker n8n agent Claude deterministic math
Two agents, one engine, one stack. Example architecture.

These are built as deployed agents, an n8n workflow behind a rate-limited API, with every number computed in code so it is auditable, and a hardened, tested architecture underneath. Both are live and running now. Type your own pricing model into the first and see what it returns, then give the second a rule and a set of billing rows and watch it reprice every one and flag the gaps. They share a single pricing engine, so the two can never disagree about what a rule means.

Try the live demo →
Track record   Still in use

The Ithaca City School District asset system: paid for itself in months, still running 20 years on

For the Ithaca City School District, we built a custom asset system that returned its cost in under 3 months and is still a core system 20 years later, tracking 64,189 assets. That longevity is the track record every AI build inherits: scope it tight and build it to last, so the value proves itself early. And it did not stand still. We used AI to build a reporting layer on top of it, so those 64,189 assets can be broken down and viewed many different ways, cut by building or category or age or whatever question comes up that day. A clever demo is easy. A system that still runs 20 years on, and keeps getting more useful, is the harder and more valuable thing.

64,189assets tracked
< 3 moto pay for itself
20+ yrsstill in daily use
Asset register
TagAssetBuildingStatus
A-10442Chromebook, studentHigh SchoolIn service
A-02218ProjectorMiddle SchoolIn service
A-31905HVAC unitFacilitiesMaintenance
A-00761School busTransportationIn service
A-18830Upright pianoElementaryIn service
A-27414Laptop cartHigh SchoolRetired
Showing 6 of 64,189 tracked assets. Example data.
Reporting, built with AI
By building By category By age By status
Elementary schools18,320
High School14,802
Facilities12,050
Middle School9,540
Transportation and admin9,477
One dataset, many views. AI built the reporting layer, so all 64,189 assets can be cut by building, category, age, or status on demand. Example data.
By age, replacement planning
22,140
under 5 yrs
19,300
5 to 9 yrs
14,600
10 to 14 yrs
8,149
15+ yrs
The same reporting view flags what is aging out, so replacements get budgeted before something fails. Example data.
Asset record
A-00761 · School bus
Transportation · in service
Acquired2006 AssignedTransportation, north route Last inspectionthis term, passed Maintenance log41 entries Replacementflagged for the next budget cycle
Every asset carries its full history, which is how a system stays trustworthy 20 years on. Example data.
Teaching & enablement   This year

And we teach it: non-technical owners, using AI on real work

Taught by Christopher Grant

This year Christopher trained 71 non-technical business owners to use AI on real work, in their own ChatGPT or Claude, taking them from a first prompt to a result they could run themselves. In a single working session, owners who had never built an automation produced a fully researched outreach list for their own event. The measure of the teaching is what they walk out able to do on their own.

71non-technical owners trained
0needed a technical background
1working session to a result they run themselves
Research sheet, built live in one session (example)
NameFocusBest-fit topicPersonalized hook
Alex RiveraCourse creatorsLaunch funnelsReferenced their recent live launchView
Sam OrtegaWellness studiosMembership growthNoted their new class formatView
Priya NairCoachesGroup programsCited their podcast episode on pricingView
Jordan LeeLocal servicesReferral systemsMentioned their community sponsorshipView
Example, de-identified. Owners built a fully researched outreach list for their own event, in one working session.
The prompt framework we teach: COSTAR
Context
Who you are and the situation
Objective
What you want the AI to do
Style
How it should be written
Tone
The feel of the output
Audience
Who it is for
Response
The format you want back
A repeatable structure, so a first prompt returns something usable instead of a guess.
A live session: the owner asks, the AI researches
Find 10 podcast hosts in my niche who interview course creators, and give me a personalized hook for each.
Here are 10, each with their focus, a recent episode, and a hook tied to something they published.Run live in the owner's own AI account
Example. The owner runs this themselves, in their own ChatGPT or Claude.
Draft outreach, written from the research
To Alex Rivera
Subject Loved your recent launch breakdown
Hi Alex, I caught your episode on launch funnels, and the part about warming a list before cart open lined up with something we are trying. Your audience of course creators is exactly who our event is for, and I would love to talk about a fit.
Example, de-identified. Personalized from the research sheet, ready for the owner to review and send.
Read the full teaching case study →
How it works

Under the hood, in everyday terms and technical ones

The same building blocks sit behind every service. Here they are twice: once for the owner, once for whoever on your team wants the detail.

Workflows and agents

In short: a repeated job gets turned into steps the system runs on its own, and checks with a person where it matters.

Technical: workflows built in n8n, each step scoped to a defined tool set and permissions, triggered by events or schedules, with human-in-the-loop checkpoints on anything that sends, pays, or publishes.

Connecting your tools

In short: the AI can reach the systems you already run, without a tangle of brittle integrations.

Technical: we connect data and tools with MCP, a common language between AI systems, which removes most of the one-off Zapier and API glue that used to make integrations fragile.

Grounding and memory

In short: it answers from your real documents, and it remembers what it should between sessions.

Technical: retrieval over your own documents grounds answers so they are accurate, not just fluent, and a memory file each session writes to gives persistence a stateless model does not have on its own.

Guardrails and control

In short: a person stays on the decisions that matter, and the system only touches what you allow.

Technical: least-privilege permissions per step, data-handling rules by tool tier, and a human-in-the-loop gate on outbound actions, so AI proposes and a person decides.

We build our own house first. Every one of these blocks runs in GLIV.AI before it reaches a client. That is why we can demonstrate the work instead of describing it.
The track record it stands on

More than 80 businesses since 2003

Cornell UniversityeBay & PayPalMartha StewartMiravalSUNY CortlandNeighborWorksPrecision FiltersDryden MutualWillet DairyCELLTREAT ScientificIthaca City School District
In their words

What clients say about the work

The same team, the same discipline, across 20 years of builds. A few of the people we have built for.

“
We needed a logo and website, and a complex back-end: an e-commerce app with registration, payments, and a database with complex rules and entity routing. GORGES handled it all with professionalism and brought our ideas to life.
Darrell LehmanPresident and CEO, Triconic
“
GORGES built a Learning Management System integrated with our SUNY Cortland payment system, and a powerful recreation database with a user-friendly back-end and an attractive public front-end. We are now working on an app for the next phase.
Dr. Lynn AndersonDistinguished Service Professor, SUNY Cortland
“
GORGES has built and managed our complex set of web-based tools since 2009, through multiple generations. The original system went live in 2010 and is still in service today, with very few support calls. The team can do pretty much anything you want.
Geoffrey E. Moore, MDPresident, Sustainable Health Systems

Want to see it on your own business?

Start with a free 20-minute call. We will show you a demonstration live and talk through where it fits. From there, the AI Readiness Diagnostic is $250 with a written report and a plan, credited to your first month of any service.

Reach us directly
Call or text 607-280-2010
Email cgrant@gorges.us
Back to the services →